77th (2013) Session
Opinions

Reports | View Comments | Submit an Opinion

View all submitted comments for each bill by the most recent, by votes for, or by votes against.

Select any Bill:	or type bill here Example: AB362
Sort by:	Most Recent Votes For Votes Against

AB6
-
For		May-08-2013
For		May-08-2013
For		May-06-2013
For		Apr-16-2013
For		Apr-11-2013
For		Apr-09-2013
For		Apr-05-2013
For		Mar-31-2013
For		Mar-24-2013
For		Mar-22-2013
For		Mar-19-2013
For	I believe taxes paid on special fuel in Clark County should stay in Clark County.	Mar-15-2013
For	Counties should get the taxes they pay. It doesn't make sense for the money to move to another county.	Mar-13-2013
For		Mar-13-2013
Against	If the state gathered taxes from a county and then returns revenue the county should decide how best to sue the revenue and not be held hostage to a forced spending method. The tax originated from the county and it is not the State's domain to force spending in such a manner.	Mar-13-2013
For		Mar-13-2013
For	This act isn't even in effect yet and it's being modified. That says something.	Mar-11-2013
For		Mar-09-2013
For		Mar-05-2013
For		Mar-05-2013
For		Feb-26-2013
For		Feb-18-2013
For		Feb-13-2013
For	If the county collected the tax, there roads are the ones being used, they should be able to keep the majority of the tax money. Come on there is no reason Humbolt, Lyon, Carson, Elko, Esmerald, Lincoln, Storey, Churchill, Nye, White Pine, Lander, Pershing, Eureka, Mineral and Douglas whose population doesn't even equal that of Washoe County should be left out in the cold just because they don't have the road maintenance that the two big ones have. Let them have their fair share. Seventeen counties each one should get revenue sources per mile of road to be maintained.	Feb-13-2013
For	Keep the money local.	Feb-06-2013
Against		Feb-05-2013

77th (2013) SessionOpinions

77th (2013) Session
Opinions